Haymaker Friday Edition

Haymaker Friday Edition
“The central bank of the United States will intervene—it was born with the buttinsky gene—and not always to a constructive end.” -Jim Grant
“The Fed has practiced an unappreciated form of government control over the economy since the Greenspan era that is antithetical to capitalism. We should hardly be surprised, then, that socialist concepts such as Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) or guaranteed income are treated seriously despite their intellectual bankruptcy.” -Michael Lewitt, author of The Credit Strategist.

Evergreen Compatibility Survey
The Most Important Merger Ever?

Shutterstock
Deal making is what Wall Street does best. That is arguably only surpassed by its proficiency at supplying gullible investors with ill-conceivedinnovative products created to play the fad du jour. Could it be, however, that the greatest Mergers and Acquisition (M&A) event of all-time happened in Washington, D.C., and not New York City?
Today’s Gavekal Research-authored Haymaker contains a provocative quote from one of my favorite Street (ironically) strategists: BofA Merrill’s Michael Hartnett. As you will soon read, the deal of the century, in his view, might be the de facto merger between the Fed and the U.S. Treasury. In case you weren’t aware of the historically significant separation of powers, those two immensely powerful U.S. government institutions are supposed to operate completely independently. Well, maybe that hasn’t been as complete as originally envisioned but, until lately, this has largely been the case.
Many pundits have noted that Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen seems to be increasingly encroaching on turf that once was the exclusive purview of Jay Powell. Whether intentional or not (I’ll go with the former), she has made moves that have potentially infringed upon the Fed’s areas of operation.
For example, her running up and down of the balances in the Treasury General Account (TGA), her department’s effective checking account, can weaken or intensify the Fed’s monetary management efforts. Another is her ability to direct government financing to the short-end of the maturity spectrum (i.e., heavily relying on T-bills versus longer-term debt). Because the Treasury’s issuance has been so skewed toward short maturities, it has had the effect of accentuating and extending the yield curve inversion (short rates higher than long rates). Perhaps that’s one reason this upside-down yield situation is the longest on record.
Personally, I think the greatest merger of all-time did, in fact, occur but I would argue that not-so-felicitous union (at least for U.S. consumers) happened in the summer of 2020. That was when the U.S. government stumbled into the economic paradigm known as Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). As a reminder, this school of thought holds that the federal government need not worry about antiquated considerations like spending limits. Rather, if there is a need — and with U.S. policymakers there always is — just spend the required money. These days, of course, the quantity of that is consistently measured in the trillions.
MMT theory also contends that should there not be enough demand for U.S. Treasurys (USTs), then the Fed simply buys them with its Magical Money Machine. This was formerly known as Quantitative Easing and I strongly suspect we haven’t heard the last of that alchemy. As I’ve often written, including as far back as the spring of 2019, the Achilles heel of MMT was almost certain to be inflation. As we saw in 2021 and 2022, it certainly was.
For whatever reason, unlike most of the private sector, Ms. Yellen elected not to finance those multi-trillion-dollar deficits with a copious quantity of long-term bonds. Instead, she kept the government’s overall maturities very short. Now, the wages of that decision are biting with Jaws-like force. The Treasury’s interest expenses are rising as fast as Donald Trump’s legal bills, as all that short-term debt rolls over at massively increased rates (like 5% vs 0.5%).
The repeated CNBC flash headline as I write this introduction on Thursday, April 25th, is “Rate Fear Rock Markets”. Most of that anxiety centers on the longer-term portion of the UST market where the 10-year and 30-year maturity are threatening to hit 5%.
As today’s Gavekal report describes, this is rendering stocks even more expensive relative to bonds than they were at the 2000 peak, the apex of the biggest stock market bubble in U.S. history. Normally, this would be a signal to sell stocks and buy bonds. Yet, if the U.S. is becoming Turkey with U.S. characteristics (meaning we aren’t going to see 60% type inflation), that traditional reallocation might be very costly in the long run. Inflation is kryptonite to bonds but it can help stocks, especially those in natural resource sectors. (Interestingly, gold stocks were up yesterday in a nasty overall tape.)
Actually, for holders of extended maturity USTs it already has been an expensive few years. In gold terms (i.e. based on real money), they’ve lost almost 50% of their value since the start of 2020. Fortunately, for those who have allocated their yield-seeking capital to emerging bond markets, an asset class the Haymaker has long favored, returns have been superior
If Louis and Charles are right, the beatings will continue until the bond market’s morale improves. Yet, with higher interest rates boosting the spending power of the private sector’s wealthiest segments, a dramatic attitude adjustment may not be nearly as imminent as the bond market bulls hope. Even never-say-sell stock market players might see more days like yesterday when most stocks and bonds head in the same southerly direction. For market geeks, that’s a positive correlation with very negative implications
David “The Haymaker” Hay

Turning Turkish II
Charles Gave & Louis-Vincent Gave
In our April 17 webinar, we touched on the outlook for global currencies during an inflationary boom. However, the webinar format prevented us from going into any great depth about the risks facing developed-economy currencies. This paper aims to make good the deficiency.
Elon Musk has likened money to the operating system of the economy. This is a parallel we have made many times, arguing that the US dollar has been the Microsoft Windows of the global trading system, while China hoped to use the renminbi to mount an Apple-style insurgency against the US dollar’s monopoly…
Subscribe to Haymaker to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Haymaker to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
Subscriber-only posts and full archive | |
Post comments and join the community |

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and David Hay makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.
The information herein is based on David Hay’s beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to David Hay on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.
David Hay shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s investment objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that David Hay has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.
David Hay serves on the Investment Committee in his capacity as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Evergreen Gavekal (“Evergreen”), registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Evergreen in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed the firm or David Hay. Investment decisions for Evergreen clients are made by the Evergreen Investment Committee. Please note that while David Hay co-manages the investment program on behalf of Evergreen clients, this publication is not affiliated with Evergreen and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Investment Committee. The information herein reflects the personal views of David Hay as a seasoned investor in the financial markets and any recommendations noted may be materially different than the investment strategies that Evergreen manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
20240426