Haymaker Friday Edition
Haymaker Friday Edition
Peak Cheap Oil – Drilling Deeper
“Presently, (oil) inventories are in line with the five-year average. Including the [Strategic Petroleum Reserve], inventories are 300 million barrels below five-year averages—a record deficit. Global inventories are just as tight.” -Goehring & Rozencwajg
Charts of the Week
For those of you who watched my short video earlier today on major breakouts in the S&P and the NASDAQ, as well as on certain energy and insurance stocks, I pointed out a few others, as well. Those involve upside “range expansions” on credit card and auto loan delinquencies. Suffice to say these are at odds with ebullient market conditions. Chalk this up to yet more examples of The Great Disconnect, the striking contrast between market action and economic fundamentals.
Green Line: Auto Delinquencies; Blue Line: Credit Card Delinquencies – (Click chart to expand)
Bloomberg
There is considerable commentary currently that markets are not in a 2021-type mania. However, when looking at flows into cryptos it’s hard to not to use the “B” word, as in bubble. Upward momentum for both cryptos and tech stocks remains powerful, but history is clear these events don’t go gently into the night once the fever breaks.
Hartnett, BofA
Evergreen Compatibility Survey
The Peak Cheap Oil Debate: We’re Gonna Need a Deeper Drill
Shutterstock
What the heck is SPRIEADUC? What language is that, anyway? Okay, it’s my feeble attempt to come up with something along the lines of NIMBY. Like I said, feeble, but actually the NIMBY comparison has some relevance, as I will mention toward the end of this note.
In my opinion, no analysis of the global oil markets is possible without considering the three initialisms I’ve bizarrely linked together: SPR, IEA, and DUC. Respectively, they stand for: 1) Strategic Petroleum Reserve, 2)International Energy Agency, and 3) Drilled, Uncompleted; again, there will be more elaboration to follow.
The February 16th Haymaker on the Peak Cheap Oil debate touched on these but, in the interest of time and space, only briefly. As many of you are aware, my friend the widely read Doomberg, has dramatically turned up the flames on this heated opinion exchange. In the process, he has taken a stance very different from mine. It’s also contrary to two of the specialized energy research firms I greatly respect: Cornerstone Analytics, and Goehring & Rozencwajg.
Of course, it’s human nature to admire sources that agree with you, and I’m no less guilty of that than the next pundit. But I do believe it’s a major omission of critical information not to consider all three of these initialisms. Unfortunately, those with a bearish, or even neutralish, view of energy, the latter of which I think applies to Doomberg, all too often ignore these three considerations.
First up, the SPR. …
Subscribe to Haymaker to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Haymaker to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
Subscriber-only posts and full archive | |
Post comments and join the community |
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and David Hay makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.
The information herein is based on David Hay’s beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to David Hay on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.
David Hay shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s investment objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that David Hay has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.
David Hay serves on the Investment Committee in his capacity as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Evergreen Gavekal (“Evergreen”), registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Evergreen in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed the firm or David Hay. Investment decisions for Evergreen clients are made by the Evergreen Investment Committee. Please note that while David Hay co-manages the investment program on behalf of Evergreen clients, this publication is not affiliated with Evergreen and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Investment Committee. The information herein reflects the personal views of David Hay as a seasoned investor in the financial markets and any recommendations noted may be materially different than the investment strategies that Evergreen manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
20240302