Making Hay Monday – July 22nd, 2024
Making Hay Monday
Break-Out Chart Ensemble
Charts of the Week
Overton
If re-elected, Donald Trump promises to once again reduce tax rates. He is asserting the resulting boost to growth will more than pay for the lost revenue. However, tax rates as a percentage of GDP have been remarkably stable at around 20% in the post-WW II era. This is despite a maximum marginal tax rate that has been as high as 90% and as low as 28%.
Cornerstone Analytics
As these pages have often noted, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has persistently underestimated global oil demand for many years. Thus, it’s odd that it is projecting very strong consumption for both this year’s second and third quarter. It begs the question of whether it is attempting to provide cover for the Biden administration (Joe Biden remains in the Oval Office… for now) to release yet more oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) in order to drive down gasoline prices prior to November.
“Everyone’s fully invested in U.S. exceptionalism. A bond investor is overweight U.S. Treasurys. An equity investor is massively long U.S. stocks and massively long U.S. tech stocks, and everyone’s now overweight the dollar. And I just wonder if this is the thing that we’re going to get wrong.” -BofA’s Chief Investment Strategist and Managing Director, Michael Hartnett
Evergreen Compatibility Survey
For this issue of Making Hay Monday (MHM), we thought readers might want to receive an update of our break-out charts edition. Undoubtedly, we’ve beaten you over the head with what we feel is one of the best ways to make profits on both a near-term and longer-term basis: identifying stocks experiencing what investing legend John Paul Tudor Jones calls range expansions. As this is a special, chart-centric edition, we will not be running our usual asset-class lists, nor the Contender and DFTC sections. All of that will return in our July 29th edition!
The basic idea is that when a stock has been in a long-defined range of, say, $20 – $40, and it breaks out clearly to the upside, it is sending a powerful signal that further appreciation is probable. By the way, the inverse is true on the downside. Selling out of breakdowns below multi-year support levels is a highly effective way of avoiding investment black holes, especially those stocks at risk of going to zero, or something in that wealth-destroying vicinity.
This has happened all too frequently, particularly with financial stocks – see Credit Suisse, SVB Bank, First Republic Bank, and Signature Bank, all last year. The Great Recession also saw several of America’s biggest financial institutions essentially wiped out. Those included Citigroup, AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Washington Mutual, and Lehman Brothers. (Only Citi dodged a complete annihilation but its stock price hit $1 at the worst, before a massive reverse split). Had one paid attention to multi-year support levels, tremendous pain could have been avoided.
Two weeks ago, we reviewed over 225 charts of stocks that were potential break-out candidates. In some cases, they hadn’t quite achieved that status. In others, the upside range expansion happened a number of months ago and the stocks had already run up substantially after shattering resistance. Consequently, those were removed. (Note: resistance is on the upside and support is at the low end of a long-term range; in both cases, longer is better and we’ve found a trading range that has persisted for at least three years is a minimum. However, as we’ve previously written, the longer the range has been in place, the more meaningful the break-out or breakdown.)
That left about 70 names, a still too-unwieldy number of stocks for the purposes of this MHM. As a result, we narrowed this down to 10. However, for those who’d like to see the full list, you’ll find contact information at the end of today’s edition to which you can send a request. This offer is for paying customers only, of course. In fact, we’re only sharing the first two ETF ideas with those who have yet to upgrade to paid-subscription status. (If you do appreciate and find actionable value in our weekly offerings, we hope you’ll consider supporting us by upgrading today.)
As you will soon see, we’ve provided some brief commentary on the stocks that made the second cut. This is not to say that there aren’t some extremely intriguing stocks among the remaining 60.
Let’s get to it.
VIG
Bloomberg – Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The first two highlights are very similar in that they are ETFs comprised of “Dividend Aristocrat-type” securities. In prior MHMs, we’ve pointed out that going back for the last 30 years or more, these have materially outperformed the S&P 500. However, over the last decade it’s been the opposite outcome.
VYM
Bloomberg – Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Since 7/11/2014, the S&P has returned 236% versus 193% and 152%, respectively, for the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund ETF (VIG) and the Vanguard High Dividend Index Fund ETF (VYM). The reason VIG has done far better than VYM – or, said differently, has performed much less poorly – is, unsurprisingly, because it has had considerably more tech exposure. Of course, it hasn’t had enough of a technology allocation to keep up with the increasingly tech- and consumer discretionary*-concentrated S&P. It’s been our contention that the Dividend Aristocrat stocks are likely to meaningfully outperform their generally lower yielding and lower quality peers. The beautiful break-outs revealed in the charts shown below strongly suggest that these elite entities are on the verge of seriously out-legging the overall stock market.
*This is primarily due to Amazon’s massive weighting in that sector.
Subscribe to Haymaker to unlock the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Haymaker to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
 | Subscriber-only posts and full archive |
| Post comments and join the community |
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and David Hay makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.
The information herein is based on David Hay’s beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to David Hay on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.
David Hay shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s investment objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that David Hay has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.
David Hay serves on the Investment Committee in his capacity as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Evergreen Gavekal (“Evergreen”), registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Evergreen in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed the firm or David Hay. Investment decisions for Evergreen clients are made by the Evergreen Investment Committee. Please note that while David Hay co-manages the investment program on behalf of Evergreen clients, this publication is not affiliated with Evergreen and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Investment Committee. The information herein reflects the personal views of David Hay as a seasoned investor in the financial markets and any recommendations noted may be materially different than the investment strategies that Evergreen manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
20240723
