Making Hay Monday – February 18th, 2025
Making Hay Monday
Onshoring
The encouraging news for the Great Green Energy Transition is that China installed 356 gigawatts of wind- and solar-generating capacity last year. To put that in perspective, a large-scale nuclear reactor typically produces approximately one gigawatt of power. America’s entire fleet of atomic energy facilities is now fewer than 100 reactors located at 54 sites (some have more than one reactor). That’s impressive, but “capacity” is the keyword in the first sentence. Because of the intermittent nature of both solar and wind, these plants operate at a fraction of nameplate capacity. As a result, they require fossil fuel back-up such as from either coal or natural gas. Coal and its derivatives, such as lignite, are the dirtiest form of producing base-load power. However, with even China more concerned about emissions, it does create an opportunity for the U.S. to increase its already rapidly growing natural gas exports
U.S. oil and gas producers have done a remarkable job of maintaining output near record highs despite a plunge in rig counts for both energy sources over the past decade. However, production growth has slowed to a snail’s pace for oil and is actually declining for natural gas. The latter is particularly alarming based on the acute need for inexpensive American gas in Asia and Europe. Per the main section of today’s Making Hay (Almost) Monday, this poses a serious threat to the Trump Administration’s goal of increasing U.S. oil equivalent barrels output by three million/day.
“Instead of replacing coal, clean energy is being layered on top of an entrenched reliance on fossil fuels. The parallel expansion of coal and renewables risks undermining Cina’s clean energy transition.” -Qi Win and Christine Shearer, in a new report from the Center for Research Energy and Clean Air (CREA) and the Global Energy Monitor (GEM), per the Financial Times 2/16/25.
Onshoring
Shutterstock
Champs
There are numerous ironies in the financial markets these days such as how, in many cases, stocks with the most questionable fundamentals have been doing moonshots (see Carvana and, until recently, Tesla). However, oil and gas service companies certainly qualify, as well, though, on an inverse basis. There continues to be zero evidence of “Drill, Baby, Drill” in their stock prices. The fact that crude inventories are at their lowest levels in over two years deepens the irony.
Last week, we described the bull case for the offshore services stocks, drawing heavily on my Kiwi pal, Trader Ferg (who currently resides in Bali). Today, we’re revisiting a sector that, for most investors, has been dead money, or worse, for many years: those oil field services companies that largely operate on terra firma.
One of the earliest suggestions in the lifecycle of our Haymaker publications was to cash in some gains that had occurred as a result of a highlight we had made of the Oil Equipment and Services ETF. We had done so in the newsletter the geriatric Haymaker wrote from 2005 until early 2022, the Evergreen Virtual Advisor (EVA)…
Subscribe to Haymaker to unlock the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Haymaker to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
 | Subscriber-only posts and full archive |
| Post comments and join the community |
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and David Hay makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.
The information herein is based on David Hay’s beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to David Hay on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.
David Hay shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s investment objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that David Hay has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.
David Hay serves on the Investment Committee in his capacity as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Evergreen Gavekal (“Evergreen”), registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Evergreen in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed the firm or David Hay. Investment decisions for Evergreen clients are made by the Evergreen Investment Committee. Please note that while David Hay co-manages the investment program on behalf of Evergreen clients, this publication is not affiliated with Evergreen and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Investment Committee. The information herein reflects the personal views of David Hay as a seasoned investor in the financial markets and any recommendations noted may be materially different than the investment strategies that Evergreen manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
20250218
