Macro Monday Missive – April 27th, 2026
Macro Monday Missive
An Energy Reckoning: The Input Nobody Priced
An Energy Reckoning: The Input Nobody Priced
“The stone age did not end because we ran out of stone.”
-Sheikh Ahmed Zaki Yamani
TL;DR Summary:
- * The market is treating the current energy tightening as a commodity cycle. It is not. The price mechanism that has historically resolved oil market tightness is intact but its output has degraded — each dollar of upstream investment buys less new net energy than it did a decade ago.
- * EROI (Energy Return on Investment) on incremental U.S. supply has declined from 50-100:1 on mid-century conventional fields to 5-10:1 on today’s tight oil formations. Dr. Charles Hall at the State University of New York identifies 10:1 as the minimum threshold for maintaining complex industrial civilization. The U.S. weighted average is currently 8-9:1 and falling.
- * Roughly 90% of global upstream investment is being consumed offsetting natural field decline. Net capacity addition, investment that actually expands the supply base, accounts for the remainder. The cumulative underinvestment since 2015 exceeds $700 billion and cannot be retroactively closed.
- * A coordination trap is preventing the supply response that high prices would normally trigger. ESG mandates inflate the cost of capital for hydrocarbon investment regardless of price signals. No individual company can justify long-cycle commitment when policy signals stranded asset risk within the project lifecycle. Everyone waits. Nobody invests. Scarcity is guaranteed.
- * AI infrastructure is creating a new category of inelastic power demand called inference at scale that runs continuously and must be filled by dispatchable fossil generation. AI deploys in 18-24 months but firm power takes 5-10 years to build. The gap is already showing up in hyperscaler power purchase agreements and backup diesel procurement.
- * Low-decline, high-EROI conventional producers and high-decline tight oil operators trade on the same crude price despite categorically different long-run economics. That valuation gap is a structural opportunity the commodity framework obscures.
- * The energy transition is itself a net consumer of the constrained fossil energy it is trying to replace and mining critical minerals, manufacturing panels and turbines, building transmission infrastructure all require substantial fossil inputs. This dynamic has been priced by neither policy nor markets.
Last week, we came across a piece from the mind of Shanaka Anslem Perera (Substack page linked below) titled The Denominator No One Watches, and found it both intriguing and spot on. We were so compelled by the piece’s main topic, that we’ve decided to offer you our own take on it. Credit to Mr. Perera for putting said topic so squarely on our radar.
Every serious energy investor today is interpreting the same data and arriving at the same uncomfortable conclusion. Basically, oil prices are elevated, rig counts are falling, and capital expenditure has not recovered to 2014 levels in real terms, despite sustained prices that should justify investment. Service sector layoffs are accelerating, yet, the dominant market narrative treats all of this as the normal ebb and flow of a commodity cycle, where high prices eventually stimulate supply and supply relieves prices. That narrative has been right often enough that abandoning it feels contrarian for its own sake. We think it is wrong this time, and the reason it is wrong has less to do with geopolitics or OPEC strategy than with something more fundamental: the energy economics of the barrels being produced today are categorically different from the barrels that defined the last 50 years…
Continue reading this post for free in the Substack app
Or upgrade your subscription. Upgrade to paid
A subscription gets you:
 | Subscriber-only posts and full archive |
| Post comments and join the community |
20260428
