Haymaker LVG Edition
Haymaker LVG Edition
“As history has repeatedly proven, one trade tariff begets another, then another – until you’ve got a full-blown trade war. No one ever wins, and consumers always get screwed.” -Mark McKinnon
As most Haymaker readers are aware, the renowned Louis Gave has offered to periodically provide content to all of you. (As is typical, the full note is available for paid subscribers.) There’s no one I know who is as prolific when it comes to writing and speaking about big-picture geopolitical, financial, and economic trends as is Louis. Accordingly, what you will see in these pages is a small fraction of what he generates. However, as you’ll soon see, it is top-notch material.
In this note, he’s pointing out the failure thus far of the tariffs put on Chinese goods by both the Trump and Biden administrations. As I’ve often noted, policy ineffectiveness is very much a bipartisan trait these days.
It is interesting that despite the 100% tariff President Biden announced this week on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), he is not placing them on hybrids from companies like BYD, China’s largest automaker. Certainly, that may change. Yet, for now, this is another reason to be much more bullish on the growth outlook for hybrids than for EVs. In turn, this means the outlook for the critical hybrid component of palladium remains highly lustrous.
Another investment relevant takeaway, as I read and re-read LVG’s note, is that the attempt to both go green and decouple from China is extremely likely to put upward pressure on inflation. That seems to be lost right now on the investment community at large which is busy celebrating yesterday’s marginally cooler inflation report.
It continues to be my view that investors with heavy exposure to traditional financial assets — and that is most of you — would be well-advised to hold increasing quantities of scarce commodities like palladium, uranium, oil, and natural gas. Fortunately, with the exception of uranium, the rest are closer to their lows than their highs, especially on an inflation-adjusted basis. Even with uranium, the supply/demand dynamics strongly suggest much higher prices over time.
One closing comment: the research-intensive Making Hay Monday (MHM) newsletter is our primary publication, with Friday Haymaker content (and Wednesday notes for Founding Members) provided as bonus material and as a “Thank you” for your continued and truly appreciated support. Because of the supplemental nature of our non-MHM content, much of what we share in that respect will be guest content from friends and peers of this newsletter. There will be readership overlap, given that many of our subscribers follow some of the high-finance luminaries we elect to re-publish. However, we feel strongly about re-sharing compelling and timely material for the benefit of those who might otherwise have missed it.
David “The Haymaker” Hay
Evergreen Compatibility Survey
Protectionism, US Industrial Policy And The Dollar
Louis-Vincent Gave
Candidate Joe Biden campaigned on a platform to adopt a green new deal, invest heavily in an energy transition and decarbonize the US economy. These promises were key to him winning over younger college-educated voters and suburban moms. So for the Biden administration to suddenly reverse course and impose big tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, batteries and solar panels marks a profound shift. If nothing else, making solar panels and EVs more expensive gives a boost to the despised hydrocarbon industry. It is probably a safe bet that in their wildest dreams, Big Oil executives did not imagine that President Biden would one day make it more expensive for Americans to drive EVs and get off the power grid.
President Biden campaigned on his green
credentials…
…but the green goals seem to have been
abandoned in favor of the rivalry with
China
Assuming that the administration is committed to “following the science”, this must thus surely mean that Biden has concluded that climate change is not the emergency it was thought to be just three years ago. This is terrific news; the fact that the planet will now avoid the Armageddon to which we seemed destined should be a cause for rejoicing. Alas, there is a less generous interpretation, namely, that while the threat of climate change has not disappeared, the threat of China now looms larger. Or in other words, even if climate change risks pushing the human race towards extinction, any potential solution that comes out of China should be discarded.
This certainly seemed to be the message coming from the president’s X account (formerly Twitter) on Tuesday (see graphic overleaf). Unfortunately, nothing was said about climate change no longer being an emergency. Instead, Biden’s focus was all about building out US industry to compete with China.
Tariffs can sometimes be a useful tool, if
they are part of a greater plan…
Subscribe to Haymaker to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Haymaker to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
 | Subscriber-only posts and full archive |
| Post comments and join the community |
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and David Hay makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.
The information herein is based on David Hay’s beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to David Hay on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.
David Hay shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s investment objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that David Hay has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.
David Hay serves on the Investment Committee in his capacity as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Evergreen Gavekal (“Evergreen”), registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Evergreen in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed the firm or David Hay. Investment decisions for Evergreen clients are made by the Evergreen Investment Committee. Please note that while David Hay co-manages the investment program on behalf of Evergreen clients, this publication is not affiliated with Evergreen and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Investment Committee. The information herein reflects the personal views of David Hay as a seasoned investor in the financial markets and any recommendations noted may be materially different than the investment strategies that Evergreen manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
20240517
