Haymaker Friday Edition with LVG
Haymaker Friday Edition with LVG
“Pandemics fast forward history.” -Yuval Noah Harari, Israeli author and historian
“The greatest credit event of all would be a recession in which U.S. yields went up, not down.” -BofA Merrill’s Michael Hartnett
Greetings, Haymaker Readers and Subscribers!
Well, we promised you all regular content from my friend and partner, Gavekal’s Louis-Vincent Gave, and delivering early on that promise is in order. And how better to initiate this new publishing cross-pollination project than with LVG’s musings on the topic of just what cyclical economic/marketplace changes we should all be looking out for in 2024? And there are some big ones.
I won’t steal any of the article’s thunder in my introduction, but I should note that the piece below has been slightly modified in a few places and has been trimmed back somewhat to make room for several blocks of detailed Haymakercommentary which you’ll see throughout. These are relatively brief passages meant to add supporting context to the many points Louis is articulating in this expansive piece. We hope you enjoy the experimental format.
Let us know in the comments section how you like the material and what other topics you’d like us to cover in the months ahead.
Thank you!
David “The Haymaker” Hay
But first, your Charts of the Week!
Yield on the Two-year Japanese Government Bond (JGB) Since 2014
(Upper-line corresponds to a 0% yield… or non-yield) – (Click chart to expand)
Bloomberg
Yield on the 10-Year JGB Since 2014 (breakout points correspond to 0.17% and 0.52%, respectively) – (Click chart to expand)
Bloomberg
Since the start of 2022, the yield on the two-year Japanese government bond (JGB) has clearly shattered upside resistance. The first penetration of this was when yields rose to minus 0.1%. (Japan was an early adopter of negative interest rates, one of the most bizarre and questionably effective “remedies” ever concocted by policymakers.) This was another example of the follow-through that happens when a well-established range is broken, in this case to the upside. In mid-2023, two-year yields began to consistently trade in positive territory, albeit still at microscopic levels. 10-year resistance has also been decisively taken out as well. This suggests JGB yields are headed higher yet despite the Bank of Japan’s halting attempt to allow rates to catch up with inflation. Because the yen has been so heavily used as a funding currency to invest in other markets, should JGB yields continue running up it could have profound implications for global asset prices.
Hartnett
The ill-advised shutdown of the global economy during Covid was unquestionably the main reason federal deficits exploded in 2020 and 2021. However, even prior to that they were running at excessive levels due to the Trump administration’s massive 2017 indefensible gift tax cut to Corporate America. (As realists predicted at the time, it did not result in an offsetting revenue windfall to the U.S. Treasury.) More disturbingly, deficits have remained at crisis-type levels even after the ravages of the pandemic have faded away and the economy has been growing at respectable clip. The reality is that never before have deficits been this large outside of the total economic collapse of the Great Depression when unemployment in the USA rose to nearly 20%. By contrast, today it is sub-4%. With the 2024 presidential election looking like a rematch of 2020, the prospects for meaningful budget deficit reduction under either a second Biden or Trump administration look bleak.
Evergreen Compatibility Survey
It’s Different This Time: Cyclical Changes For 2024
Louis-Vincent Gave
As investors put a bow on 2023, the general consensus was that growth both in the US and globally would slow. But not slow all the way into a recession, in part thanks to falling energy prices (an effective tax cut for most consumers) and a roll-over in inflation (boosting consumers’ disposable income). In turn, milder growth and lower inflation would push the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates. The happy days of the disinflationary boom (bottom right on the diagrams below) were hence around the corner. Such an investment environment was positive for bonds (cue a massive rally in November and December) and growth stocks everywhere.
Yet, never have the world’s major economies sent out such conflicting signals. Sure, the US is back to signaling a disinflationary boom, but China is indicating a disinflationary bust, commodity producers like Canada, Australia, South Africa and Norway are telling us the world is set to face an inflationary bust, while most of Europe, Japan and the rest of Asia are pointing the way to an inflationary boom!
One can cogently make a case for any of these four scenarios today, which means things are a mess. Having said that, I will argue for growth (and to a lesser extent inflation), for the following reasons.
Haymaker Comments: Louis’s observation that things are a mess, or at least extremely muddled right now, is consistent with my Edward R. Murrow quote from last week that anyone who isn’t confused really doesn’t understand the situation.
The Four Quadrant matrix shown above is a Gavekal staple from the earliest days of the firm’s formation. It’s a helpful way to look at the world, especially when it is fairly clear in which quadrant global financial and economic conditions currently reside. That’s definitely not the case at this time when there are such strong countervailing forces. As we get deeper into his note, we’ll seem some reasons why it’s so difficult to have a high degree of conviction as to where the global economy is right now… much less, where it will be as the year unfolds.
Subscribe to Haymaker to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Haymaker to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
 | Subscriber-only posts and full archive |
| Post comments and join the community |
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and David Hay makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.
The information herein is based on David Hay’s beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to David Hay on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.
David Hay shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s investment objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that David Hay has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.
David Hay serves on the Investment Committee in his capacity as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Evergreen Gavekal (“Evergreen”), registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Evergreen in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed the firm or David Hay. Investment decisions for Evergreen clients are made by the Evergreen Investment Committee. Please note that while David Hay co-manages the investment program on behalf of Evergreen clients, this publication is not affiliated with Evergreen and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Investment Committee. The information herein reflects the personal views of David Hay as a seasoned investor in the financial markets and any recommendations noted may be materially different than the investment strategies that Evergreen manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
20240127
