Haymaker Friday Edition
Haymaker Friday Edition
StoneX’s Vincent Deluard on International Stocks
“Why is this market so unshakable? It must be because 1) so many people have so much surplus money to invest; 2) that hundreds of thousands of newcomers have watched others make money in the market, and are determined to do likewise; 3) stocks are scarce in relation to total demand; 4) the specter of inflation makes common stocks widely sought; 5) corporate earnings are rising. This roaring market shows no signs of slackening its pace.” -Ira Cobleigh, in his book ‘Happiness is a Stock that Doubles in a Year’ (1968). (Per John Hussman, this came out right before the 1969 collapse in the high-flying stocks of that era.)
“The idea of Israel now attacking Iran’s oil assets is something we see as a zero probability. The ill will it would engender by turning something into a… really, a global problem, we think, is the reason it’s got such an infinitesimally small, or what I would say is a zero-probability occurrence.” -Mike Rothman, Cornerstone Analytics
Hello, Readers and Subscribers:
Before I get into my usual introduction to a Guest Haymaker piece, I wanted to comment on the bizarre media coverage of the oil market recently. Frankly, I’ve never seen such blatant disinformation, bordering on misinformation, in my career. Of course, that’s only been about 45½ years!
This charade, masquerading as serious reporting, started with a Financial Times article last week stating that OPEC was preparing to abandon its production discipline and let the price fall sharply. By the end of last week, CNBC was providing what seemed like nonstop coverage of this alleged policy change. The tone wasn’t merely that OPEC was going to unleash more production; rather, it was that it had already announced its intent to do so. (By the way, these media sources almost never explain why OPEC cut back production in the first place — namely, the release of almost 300 million barrels from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Of course, that was absolutely NOT politically motivated!)
This prompted me to utilize my new favorite LLM tool, Perplexity AI. (Thank you, Roger, for turning me on to that great service.) It clearly replied that OPEC had made NO such an announcement. Then, I went to our main resource for reliable intel on the crude market: Cornerstone Macro. It has long-standing and high-level contacts at OPEC. Their sources were adamant that reports of said announcement were bogus, despite the repeated media chatter contending they were fait accompli.
Then, yesterday, the Wall Street Journal ran a front page item in its “What’s News” section declaring that, “The Saudi oil minister said that crude prices could fall to as low as $50 per barrel if OPEC+ members don’t stick to agreed-on production limits, delegates to the cartel said.”
(Notice that last phrase. In the body of the article, there was no mention of the names of these delegates. Naturally, it’s always tough to challenge anonymous sources.)
The Journal chose to run this piece yesterday, despite that OPEC itself put out the following press release on Wednesday (i.e., giving the Journal time to pull the article):
With reference to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) article, dated 2 October 2024, titled “Saudi Oil Min Said Prices May Fall to $50/B if Others Cheat, Sources Say,” the OPEC Secretariat categorically refutes the claims made within the story as “wholly inaccurate and misleading.”
The article falsely reported that a conference call took place in which the Saudi Arabian Energy Minister allegedly warned OPEC+ members of a potential price drop to $50/barrel should they fail to comply with agreed production cuts. It also attributed an alleged quote to the Minister, stating: “Some better shut up and respect their commitments toward OPEC+.” These claims are entirely unfounded.
OPEC secretariat stresses that no such conference call occurred last week, nor has any call or video conference taken place since the last OPEC+ meeting on September 5th. The alleged statements, attributed to unnamed sources, lack any credibility and are completely fabricated.
OPEC secretariat emphasizes that its meetings, whether in person or via teleconference, are consistently conducted in a civil and respectful manner. Therefore, it is deeply concerning that the WSJwould publish such a report, which not only lacks journalistic integrity and professionalism but also shows a blatant disregard for the respect owed to OPEC+ Ministers.
While I realize there is no love lost between Western oil consumers and OPEC, it is important to consider the unintended consequences of oil price crashes. With a market that is already seriously under-supplied (the critical Cushing, Oklahoma storage facility is close to its lowest levels ever), the disincentive to producers by creating ultra-low prices sets the stage for future shortages… and eventual price spikes…
Subscribe to Haymaker to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Haymaker to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
 | Subscriber-only posts and full archive |
| Post comments and join the community |
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and David Hay makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.
The information herein is based on David Hay’s beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to David Hay on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.
David Hay shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s investment objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that David Hay has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.
David Hay serves on the Investment Committee in his capacity as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Evergreen Gavekal (“Evergreen”), registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Evergreen in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed the firm or David Hay. Investment decisions for Evergreen clients are made by the Evergreen Investment Committee. Please note that while David Hay co-manages the investment program on behalf of Evergreen clients, this publication is not affiliated with Evergreen and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Investment Committee. The information herein reflects the personal views of David Hay as a seasoned investor in the financial markets and any recommendations noted may be materially different than the investment strategies that Evergreen manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
20241005
