Haymaker Friday Edition
Haymaker Friday Edition
Michael Lewitt Analyzes Chinese Economics (& the Case for Gold)
The Credit Strategist, authored by Haymaker ally Michael Lewitt, has, in a recent post titled Pouring It On, outlined some major challenges presently threatening to destabilize, or at least substantially diminish the imperialnational health of the world’s second-largest (and, per Lewitt, “over-leveraged”) economy. That, of course, would be China. At the center of China’s crisis matrix is a problem with which one too many developed-world nations are contending: debt. This is particularly problematic for a country which Lewitt correctly describes as suffering from “… [an] anti-business regulatory assault and Beijing’s flaccid reaction to the country’s sharp economic slowdown.”
It’s reasonable to assume that whatever means of generating economic revitalization and marketplace dynamism might be innately available to China are functionally handicapped by bureaucratic meddling. This is magnified by governmental powers that seem to hold free-market solutions in abject contempt.
Evergreen Compatibility Survey
Added to its economic woes is a population decline which, per a growing body of demographic research, does not seem capable of reversing itself. But far be it for the Chinese politburo to make necessary foreign policy adjustments after objectively assessing the country’s fiscal condition and demographic trends.
Instead, as Lewitt points out:
China is reportedly now spending over $700 billion annually on its military in efforts to assert hegemony in Asia and counter US influence around the world while wrestling with insolvent banks & local governments. China suffers from believing its own press releases about its power while ignoring its dangerously shrinking population and unsustainable economic model.
Lewitt’s thesis expands outward to encompass the similarly troubled United States, at least with respect to its own debt and political woes. Geopolitically speaking, America’s impulse towards overseas intervention could see us colliding with a China that can’t seem to keep its military reach and its imperial grasp properly aligned. (If this dual criticism sounds highly similar to our appraisal of the two U.S. presidential candidates, that is strictly coincidental.)
In making a case for individual protection as global insanity looms, Lewitt goes on to say:
This is a recipe for economic turbulence including higher inflation, trade barriers, debt defaults, & market dislocations. Lowering interest rates in such an environment may seem sensible but is actually the trigger point for chaos. What is needed now is policy stability and pro-growth policies based on settling geopolitical disputes before they collapse into expensive and uncontrollable conflict.
These are all reasons to buy gold to protect yourselves.
We’ve linked to the full Lewitt piece, which we advise you to read for yourselves. Whatever’s ahead for China and the U.S., burgeoning debts and misguided militarism are very probably going to remain in the cards; we can only hope both are governed into a manageable state (hold your laughter) before the Global Fates deal the world a dead man’s hand.
In the interest of balanced analysis, we’ve also included some excerpts from a recent research note authored by the venerable Louis-Vincent Gave, founder of Gavekal Research. For investors, the key decision at this point is whether or not the extraordinarily depressed Chinese market is a buy. Based on Michael’s take, one might conclude probably not. But in light of the very aggressive stimulus package Beijing has recently unveiled, perhaps that’s not the correct conclusion. Accordingly, with an open mind, let’s see what Louis has to say on the matter.
Subscribe to Haymaker to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Haymaker to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
 | Subscriber-only posts and full archive |
| Post comments and join the community |
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and David Hay makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.
The information herein is based on David Hay’s beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to David Hay on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.
David Hay shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s investment objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that David Hay has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.
David Hay serves on the Investment Committee in his capacity as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Evergreen Gavekal (“Evergreen”), registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Evergreen in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed the firm or David Hay. Investment decisions for Evergreen clients are made by the Evergreen Investment Committee. Please note that while David Hay co-manages the investment program on behalf of Evergreen clients, this publication is not affiliated with Evergreen and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Investment Committee. The information herein reflects the personal views of David Hay as a seasoned investor in the financial markets and any recommendations noted may be materially different than the investment strategies that Evergreen manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
20240927
