Haymaker Friday Edition
Haymaker Friday Edition
Great Minds Edition: Part II
Shutterstock
“Saying what we think gives us a wider conversational range than saying what we know.” -Cullen Hightower
Last week’s sampling of recent thoughts from several of our most highly regarded fellow financial newsletter scribes generated an unusual level of interest. As most of you are aware, we asked our prized sources to share their views on the extreme volatility, both up and down, seen in the financial markets in recent weeks. Consequently, we thought we’d include a few more, including a couple that came in after we sent out last week’s edition and some others from outside the Haymaker inner-circle.
One of those late arrivals is from Luke Gromen, publisher of The Forest for the Trees. Some of you who opened last week’s Haymaker edition later in the day, or in subsequent days, already saw his comments. However, we wanted to make sure all our loyal subscribers didn’t miss Luke’s response to our inquiry.
Luke is making a critical point with which we agree; namely, that Western policymakers are prepared to inject as much liquidity into the system as needed to prevent a major market convulsion. In America, we suspect that reaction function is likely to persist until the November presidential election. After that, all bets are off, in our view. Essentially, we’ve learned never to underestimate the Fed and the Treasury’s ability to stabilize the stock market, particularly to achieve a desired political outcome.
As Luke has often articulated in his newsletters, federal government tax receipts are now highly reliant on buoyant stock prices. With the deficit already pushing $2 trillion (again!), a further budget blowout would be about as well-received as a visit to the Kremlin by Ukrainian president Zelenskyy (unless he was “visiting” in a hearse).
One way policy poobahs could goose the markets between now and November might be by releasing $500 billion or more from the Treasury General Account (TGA). That is basically Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s checking account. She has proven herself most adept at bending markets toward her will, regardless of the long-term costs of levitating asset prices to dangerous levels.
The next entry, from Jim Grant’s organization, was admittedly not in response to our request for their thoughts, as were Luke’s and another Grant (as in Williams). However, the factoids Jim Grant relayed in his August 2nd issue from Accumulus Capital Management’s Sam Wood turned out to be brilliantly prescient. Frankly, we believe they are still applicable to the fact that markets have put forth a decent rally (or maybe because of that return to the no-worries mindset). As you will shortly read, they are a wonderfully succinct summary of the set-up for serious market dislocations.
Don’t get us wrong: it may take another serious shakeout to trigger the usual fiscal and monetary trickery coordination known as the plunge protection process. It’s a policy prescription that began almost 40 years ago, under Alan Greenspan. We’re not sure at what point the Powell/Yellen put option will kick in, but we have no doubt it’s waiting in the wings of the Marriner Eccles and U.S. Treasury buildings.
Coincidentally, the author of the next section is also named Wood, in this case Christopher. He’s the brains behind one of my regular weekly reads, his chart-rich GREED & fear report.
One of the unique observations he’s making is that the exponential growth in illiquid private equity investments among institutional “whales”, such as endowment funds, has a feedback loop into public markets during periods of turmoil. When margin calls go viral, as they did recently, these entities are forced to sell what they can: their listed securities. It’s not that they want to, it’s that they need to. As Jeff Gundlach has said (slightly paraphrasing), when it comes to the financial markets, a force even more powerful than fear or greed is need.
It’s possible we are past the worst of the cascade of involuntary selling these de facto global margin calls precipitated. Yet the potential for another series of liquidation spasms should not be dismissed. In other words, it’s not a bad time to hunker down a bit and take advantage of some of the powerful snapbacks that have occurred.
In the next section, our friend and partner Louis Gave makes his case for why some caution is in order. In our view, he’s on the money when it comes to appreciating how literally explosive the situation is now between Israel and Iran. Of course, the Russian/Ukraine war is another geopolitical risk that has entered a new phase with the latter’s surprisingly effective incursion into Russia. If it continues to penetrate deeper into “The Motherland” – admittedly, a big “if” — Putin may threaten to deploy tactical nukes. If the threat becomes dire enough, he might go beyond threats. Regardless, the U.S. stock market continues to behave as if this is the late 1990s when the federal budget was solidly in the black, the economy was booming and geopolitical risks were negligible (at least for a few more years).
After those wise and cautionary words from LVG, we have a superb take from friend of the elder Haymaker, Trader Ferg, who has some concerns about the risks associated with too much free money and what current market conditions mean for commodities.
To end on an upbeat note, we’ve included a link to another Adam Taggart podcast. It seemed like the perfect bookend to the one we ran last week when he interviewed Danielle DiMartino Booth, another staunch Haymaker ally. For those of you who listened to that, you know she is convinced a recession is already underway. In fact, she contends it may have started almost a year ago.
Conversely, Adam’s most recent interviewee, Darius Dale, is of the opposite mind. His firm is called 42 Macro because, logically, it tracks 42 different macro, or big picture, indicators. This remarkably comprehensive set of economic and financial signals has allowed Darius to make some of the best forecasts we’ve witnessed over these last few very confusing years. We’ll be the first to admit some of our anticipations have been thrown off by unprecedented conditions (such as the aforementioned federal deficits). Believe us, we’ve got a ton of company in that regard. However, that does not apply to Darius. For at least two years I’ve been tracking his forecasts and positioning. Those have been impressive enough to cause us to subscribe to his institutional service this week.
Accordingly, you’ll be reading some of his insights in future Haymaker editions. In the meantime, we think you’ll find this a fascinating listen… and be sure to check out the end when he discusses one of our favorite overarching themes: the Fourth Turning.
The Haymaker Team
Subscribe to Haymaker to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Haymaker to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
 | Subscriber-only posts and full archive |
| Post comments and join the community |
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and David Hay makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.
The information herein is based on David Hay’s beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to David Hay on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.
David Hay shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s investment objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that David Hay has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.
David Hay serves on the Investment Committee in his capacity as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Evergreen Gavekal (“Evergreen”), registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Evergreen in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed the firm or David Hay. Investment decisions for Evergreen clients are made by the Evergreen Investment Committee. Please note that while David Hay co-manages the investment program on behalf of Evergreen clients, this publication is not affiliated with Evergreen and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Investment Committee. The information herein reflects the personal views of David Hay as a seasoned investor in the financial markets and any recommendations noted may be materially different than the investment strategies that Evergreen manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
20240816
