Haymaker Friday Edition
Haymaker Friday Edition
“As a rule, panics do not destroy capital; they merely reveal the extent to which it has been destroyed (by the taking on of excess leverage in good times)” -John Mills, the influential 19th century economist, as quoted infrom Howard Marks’ May newsletter
“Deficit spending was the high-powered economic boost, and the rest of the QE/QT discussion is simply rearranging deck chairs on what will likely be a slowing submerging economy in the coming quarters.” -The MacroTourist’s Kevin Muir, from his 6/24/2024 issue
Evergreen Compatibility Survey
Brief Post-Debate Note:
We had originally planned to run a note in response to yesterday evening’s POTUS Debate, particularly if the candidates spoke in substantive terms on topics of economic relevance — you know, topics which we could ourselves substantively tie to frequent Haymaker themes.
Those of you who actually saw the debate know that the only takeaways of any significant importance to you and us have nothing to do with the economy. However, for now, the behavior of the two candidates last night once again underscores how vital it was for the No Labels’ alternative candidate to have been put forth. It is sad for America that none of the individuals approached were willing to run. At this point, the odds are higher that President Biden will not represent his party than Donald Trump will be dropped, despite the latter’s highly controversial felony conviction. We might now be looking at the ultimate political example of a Hobson’s choice.
We’ll leave it at that and follow up on this topic should it subsequently yield anything more germane to our respective arenas.
The Haymaker Team
Milk of Amnesia
Shutterstock
When it comes to risk tolerance, it seems as though millions of investors have been drinking from a cup filled with a memory eraser. This is despite the fact that the wealth devastating year of 2022 wasn’t all that long ago. Yet, to be fair, when you look back at the last 15 years the duration of difficult markets has been remarkably short.
Similarly, the ability of the U.S. stock market to continue trading at unusually elevated valuations has also been stunning. This has been the case with the relentless “market share grab” America has enjoyed when it comes to its percentage of global market value. It seemed stretched when it hit 40% relative to around 24% of the world’s economic output or GDP. Now it is over 50% and America’s share of worldwide GDP remains just under 25%.
There are myriad ways to express the U.S. equity market’s disconnect with its historic valuation range. One of those that gets a lot of press is the so-called “Buffett Indicator”, comparing the market capitalization of all America’s stocks to its GDP. As you can see, it is well beyond where it was in early 2000. That is significant because that period marked the most overvalued point in U.S. stock market history, exceeding even 1929.
Advisor Perspectives
However, one of the most historically reliable metrics is price-to-sales (P/S), particularly compared to price-to-earnings (P/E). As many Haymaker readers are aware, that’s because it’s much harder to fudge revenues than profits. (For example, consider how tech companies are able to inflate net income by ignoring option expenses and by extending server depreciation, per Fred Hickey’s comments last week.)…
Subscribe to Haymaker to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Haymaker to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
 | Subscriber-only posts and full archive |
| Post comments and join the community |
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and David Hay makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.
The information herein is based on David Hay’s beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to David Hay on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.
David Hay shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s investment objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that David Hay has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.
David Hay serves on the Investment Committee in his capacity as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Evergreen Gavekal (“Evergreen”), registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Evergreen in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed the firm or David Hay. Investment decisions for Evergreen clients are made by the Evergreen Investment Committee. Please note that while David Hay co-manages the investment program on behalf of Evergreen clients, this publication is not affiliated with Evergreen and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Investment Committee. The information herein reflects the personal views of David Hay as a seasoned investor in the financial markets and any recommendations noted may be materially different than the investment strategies that Evergreen manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
20240628
