Haymaker Friday Edition
Haymaker Friday Edition
Louis-Vincent Gave: ‘Western Policymakers’ Toolkit’
“The price which society pays for the law of competition, like the price it pays for cheap comforts and luxuries, is great; but the advantages of this law are also greater still than its cost- for it is to this law that we owe our wonderful material development, which brings improved conditions in its train.”
Shutterstock
Personally, I’m not a fan of China’s top-down-driven economic model. In many ways, I believe it plays by unfair rules that allow it to dominate key industries. Chinese global theft of intellectual property is of legendary magnitude and I wouldn’t want to work in a Shenzehn factory, ultra-modern though it may be (I’d probably have no chance vs. an industrial robot anyway — would anyone?). There’s also no doubt that it devotes immense resources into, apparently successful, efforts to sabotage destabilize the West (more on that in a future Haymaker.)
However, reality is reality, and, as you will read in this edition of a Louis Gave-authored Haymaker, the fact of the matter is that China is no longer merely a supplier of raw and intermediate goods to the Western production process. It is now a significant and, in some cases, ruthless competitor in high valued-added products, including trains, almost all things green energy-related, automobiles, and, increasingly, nuclear power plants.
In fact, it is now the planet’s biggest auto exporter and is particularly dominant in electric vehicles (EVs) and the even faster-growing segment of hybrids. In the nuke space, it has 23 large-scale plants under construction versus none in the U.S. Further, it can complete these at about a third of what it costs to build them in the politically freer but bureaucratically sclerotic United States. It has become proficient enough that it is building atomic energy plants for other countries.
Shutterstock
As a result of moving up the export quality ladder, China’s trade surplus has roughly tripled over the last decade, as Louis notes. This is despite the tariffs placed on its goods by both the Trump and Biden administrations (in the case of the latter, those are now 100% on EVs). Ominously for the future of the West’s ability to compete, China now graduates more engineers than the U.S. and Western Europe combined.
Shutterstock
In this article, Louis is making the case that Western policymakers are unlikely to let China flood their countries with economically essential products, such as cars. The U.S. is likely to be particularly aggressive in protecting its domestic producers because the dollar is drastically overvalued. (Louis has made that point in other missives, though not in this one.) As a result, the Fed may resort to steep rate cuts to cheapen the dollar if it gets any cover from either a swooning economy or easing inflation. (In my view, the former is becoming the more likely scenario.)
One of LVG’s key messages here is that any recession- or near recession-related inflation improvements are likely to be short lived. That’s a conclusion with which I wholeheartedly agree. It’s also why I believe bond rallies such as we’re seeing now are best to rent and not own.
David “The Haymaker” Hay
Evergreen Compatibility Survey
Western Policymakers’ Toolkit
Louis-Vincent Gave
For global investors, the overall narrative on China has shifted in front of their eyes. Indeed, the story for the last five years roughly ran as follows:
“China has massively overinvested in real estate. Bank loans are going bad. The shadow banking system will implode and growth will melt away. Eventually, China will have no choice but to massively devalue the renminbi to get its economy back on track. China’s entire growth model is broken. On top of that, Xi Jinping is too authoritarian, too unpredictable and too nationalistic. Putting it all together, China is uninvestable”.
The effect of this narrative, combined with China’s overuse of Draconian Covid policies, means that few investors have even bothered to visit the country in recent years—or if they did, they didn’t stop by our Beijing and Hong Kong offices to say hello! Hence, most investors have missed the key macro development of China rapidly ascending the industrial value chain. Yet as Chinese automakers release ever cooler cars on a weekly basis, ignoring this rise now requires the beholder to wear blinders.
Recent weeks have seen a series of impressive product releases by Chinese carmakers
In recent weeks, Xiaomi drew gasps when launching its SU7 electric vehicle and showcasing an ultramodern factory. Then X-Peng unveiled its flying car, followed by BYD’s amphibious SUV. BYD then rolled out the Qin, a hybrid car that can travel 100km on three liters of fuel, allowing 2000km range on a tank of gas and a full charge (all for US$14,000 a pop). More worryingly for other industrial powers, China is building a lead in other key segments including solar panels, batteries, tractors, earth-moving equipment, smartphones, telecom switches, high-speed rail and even nuclear power plants!
While the rest of the world was not looking, Chinese producers began to achieve huge trade surpluses
All of this reminds me of Deng Xiaoping’s advice to China’s leadership in the early 1990s: …
Subscribe to Haymaker to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber of Haymaker to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
A subscription gets you:
 | Subscriber-only posts and full archive |
| Post comments and join the community |
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and David Hay makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.
The information herein is based on David Hay’s beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to David Hay on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized or that an investment strategy will be successful. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.
David Hay shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinion, forecast, projection, risk assumption, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s investment objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that David Hay has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.
David Hay serves on the Investment Committee in his capacity as Co-Chief Investment Officer of Evergreen Gavekal (“Evergreen”), registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Evergreen in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed the firm or David Hay. Investment decisions for Evergreen clients are made by the Evergreen Investment Committee. Please note that while David Hay co-manages the investment program on behalf of Evergreen clients, this publication is not affiliated with Evergreen and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Investment Committee. The information herein reflects the personal views of David Hay as a seasoned investor in the financial markets and any recommendations noted may be materially different than the investment strategies that Evergreen manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
20240607
